Pages

7.26.2005

Salvation and World Religions

Ok, so here we go . . . I'm on an email discussion list (where I'm the only Catholic - pray for me!), and right now we're talking about salvation through Jesus. I have some thoughts on that, but I want to start from a slightly different angle.

In Catholicism, participation in the sacramental life of the church is a normative way of achieving salvation. The only way to participate in the sacramental life of the church is through baptism, the "first" sacrament. The normal way that baptism is received by an individual is through a baptismal ceremony that takes place during Mass. The priest will pour or sprinkle water on your forehead (or dunk you three times under water, according to parish/diocesan custom and age), and baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

And poof! - you're a new member of the church (whether you're 1, 10 or 100).

However, the church recognizes that there may be times when being baptized by a priest is an impossibility. At numerous times and in numerous places priest have been in short supply or outlawed, and baptism by a priest is nigh impossible. In circumstances where it's a life or death situation, any baptized person can validly baptize another . . . any - doesn't even have to be Catholic! :-)

So if a busload of pregnant Catholic women is stranded in the desert aboard a bus that's about to be hit by a meteor, and they all give birth at the same time, and there's no priest to baptize them, any of them can validly perform a baptism on all of the new babies. And if they're too tired (for some weird reason) to perform the baptism, then the Lutheran bus driver or the Methodist husband could also perform the baptism as well. And there would be no need to have the babies "rebaptized" in a Catholic church because they would have already received the sacrament of baptism.

But it gets better. If you're studying to become a Catholic, and sincerely want to be baptized into the Catholic church, but you die before you get baptized, you're considered baptized by desire. Remember our bus? If there's a fellow sleeping in the corner, and he's a catechumenate (someone studying to become Catholic - don't you love fancy words?!), and he's on his way to be baptized in his home town, and he dies when the meteor hits, he's still considered to be validly baptized - a fully practicing member of the Catholic faith - he's already 7/12th of the way to heaven because of his baptism by desire.

But wait - there's more! (I remind myself of a late night TV commercial trying to sell you <>) If you're even thinking about joining the church (you haven't even started taking classes yet!) and you die protecting the faith, or you die practicing the faith, then you're considered baptized by blood - your martyrdom becomes the gateway to your (admittedly extremely brief) sacramental life. Back on the bus, an agnostic young lady who's been reading my (pre-quiz) blog and who was thinking of calling up a priest to set up classes selflessly sacrifices herself when rabid jackelopes enter the bus, throwing herself in harm way so that the herd of demonic critters eats her instead of the new babies - she's had a valid baptism by blood. (One of the reasons that so many saints are martyrs is because the church has for centuries recognized that dying for your faith pretty much means you get an all-access backstage pass once you hit the afterlife!)

So the sense I get is that the Catholic church, far from trying to narrowly define who gets into heaven, is actually trying to show that the doors are thrown pretty wide open - God is waiting with open arms, and God, it seems, has set things up for us to get in . . . because for some weird reason he loves us and wants us with him for all of eternity! :-)

On a quick note before I change topics: I think that one of the things that this sacramental stance implies is that you don't have to be Catholic to enter heaven (I know - all of you just took a sigh of relief!) - since the church recognizes all Trinitarian baptism as valid, you're pretty much good to go!

Having said that, let's go on to my stance regarding salvation for people who aren't Christian (of any denomination). . .

I have heard it said, and there are many Scripture quotes supporting this, that if you don't confess that Jesus is Lord and Savior you don't get saved - period - no ifs, ands, or buts. But I have a problem with this stance. Part of it is my Catholic faith - as you can see from everything else I wrote, we're trying hard to get everyone in. :-) Part of it, I know, is my own personality - I tend to err on the side of gentleness, mercy, compassion, forgiveness, etc. The last part of it, though, is where I jump back to Scripture - Matthew 25:31-46.

Here, Jesus tells the story about the sheep and the goats . . . the sheep are out feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting those who are sick and in prison, welcoming strangers, etc. . . . and Jesus says that they're blessed by his Father and that they will inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world. Now, these people are pretty confused . . . Jesus says that they did this for him. So they speak up (never being ones to just quietly follow along) - when did we do this, they demand? And he says "whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me." And the people are pretty shocked . . . "you mean, that guy on the subway . . . the pregnant high school kid I helped out . . . my crabby aunt who was in the hospital . . . the gang member who was hurt . . . my ex-wife . . . that guy who never blogged very much" and on and on and on . . . every single good deed, every single helpful, kind and compassionate act - that brought about their salvation . . . nowhere does Jesus say "those who called on my name for salvation - single file line here . . . everyone else . . . sucks to be you!" (I'm roughly paraphrasing, of course) :-)

I believe that God saves through Jesus Christ . . . I wouldn't call myself a Catholic Christian if I didn't believe that. But I also believe that the Paschal Mystery (Jesus' incarnation, birth, life, passion, death, resurrection and ascension) redeemed the cosmos - every atom, every person, every planet, every solar system, every dimension - everything . . . and that salvation is available to everyone because of that, through their own faith, and not just because a person happens to belong to the right club (Christian one).

One last thought: I also like the parable in Matthew 20:1-16, in conjunction with Matthew 25 . . . This parable talks about a landowner who needs workers in his vineyards. He goes out at 6 AM, finds some unemployed people, and agrees to pay them a day's wages for their work. At 9 AM, realizing they'll never finish in time, he goes and gets some more people to work. He does the same at noon, at 3 PM, and then at 5 PM. When quitting time comes around at 6 PM, he tells people to line up to receive payment, those who came in at 5 PM at the front of the line, the rest in chronological order. The last batch of people are paid a full day’s wage . . . you can imagine how happy they were (I sometimes wish my principal would follow this Scriptural example!). Everyone else gets a bit excited - they're expecting more. By the time the last batch of people gets there, everyone is angry - everyone got paid the exact same thing. So they complain - what the *&#($ is going on? We worked our assets off all day, and these bums who only worked an hour get the same pay we did?!?!? (Sorry for the rough language!)

The point of the parable is telling: My friend, the landowner says, I am not cheating you. Did you not agree with me for the usual daily wage? Take what is yours and go. What if I wish to give this last one the same as you? Am I not free to do as I wish with my own money? Are you envious because I am generous?

I think God may have that problem with many Christians on the day we enter heaven - we'll look around, see the pagans, the heretics, the agnostics, the atheists, the lost, the broken, the not-so-faithful, the twice-a-year Christians, the abortionists, the Muslims, the Hindus, the rock and roll guys, the promiscuous, the greedy, and on and on and on and on . . . and we'll complain: God, we followed all the rules, we stayed within the lines, we fasted and we read and we prayed and we tithed and we called on Jesus and we went to Church and we held hands with people we really didn't like . . . why are all these other people here?

And God'll answer: I don't understand . . . you're in heaven . . . with me . . . for all eternity, for ever and ever and ever . . . that’s not enough? Can't I be generous, compassionate, loving, forgiving, merciful . . . do you really think my love is limited? You have your reward . . . please don't be envious because I am generous.

That’s the God that I believe in, that’s the faith that I proclaim, and that’s my hope for the salvation of the world. My prayer is that we’ll all see each other at that great, final banqueting feast in the awe-some and awe-filled presence of God.

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

7.24.2005

I'm A Sacrament :-)

I took yet another quiz (culled from another blog), this one based off of Avery Dulles' Models of the Church. I tried pasting in my results but they looked atrocious (and I didn't feel like messing with the HTML), so I'm cutting and pasting straight from the website:

You scored as Sacrament model.
Your model of the church is Sacrament. The church is the effective sign of the revelation that is the person of Jesus Christ. Christians are transformed by Christ and then become a beacon of Christ wherever they go. This model has a remarkable capacity for integrating other models of the church.


I studied this in college, took a course while working with the Diocese, and I've re-read Dulles' book as well, and I resonate with the sacramental model - it was and continues to be my favorite model.

My next two models were Mystical Communion (78%) and Servant (72%), both of which I remember liking as well (but not as much as the sacramental model).

What can I say? I'm Catholic through and through! But more then that, I like seeing the church (each and every one of us an individual and all of us corporately) as a living sign and an efficacious symbol of the presence of God in our midst. It reminds me that we are called to be light for the world, salt for the earth, and leaven for the bread; that we are to light our candles instead of cursing the darkness; that we are called to herald the inbreaking of the reign of God to all the corners of the world.

Silly me - almost forgot: the quiz can be taken here. Enjoy! :-)

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

7.22.2005

PETA

Interesting read - thought I'd post it since I had posted earlier about eating animals:

The following story is from This is True dated 17 July 2005. It isCopyright 2005 Randy Cassingham, all rights reserved, and reprinted herewithpermission:

"Ethical" Defined

After more than 100 dead dogs were dumped in a trash dumpster overfour weeks, police in Ahoskie, N.C., kept an eye on the trash receptaclebehind a supermarket. Sure enough, a van drove up and officers watchedthe occupants throw in heavy plastic bags. They detained the two peoplein the van and found 18 dead dogs in plastic bags in the dumpster,including puppies; 13 more dead dogs were still in the van. Police saythe van is registered to the headquarters of People for the EthicalTreatment of Animals, and the two occupants, Andrew B. Cook, 24, andAdria Joy Hinkle, 27, identified themselves as PETA employees. An autopsyperformed on one of the dogs found it was healthy before it was killed.Police say PETA has been picking up the animals -- alive -- from NorthCarolina animal shelters, promising to find them good homes. Cook andHinkle have been charged with 62 felony counts of animal cruelty. Inresponse to the arrests PETA President Ingrid Newkirk said it's againstthe group's policy for employees to dump animals in the trash, but "thatfor some animals in North Carolina, there is no kinder option thaneuthanasia." (Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald) ...Oops, my mistake: that's"Playing God" Defined.


In his author's notes section, Cassingham had more to say about thisstory:

The more I learn about PETA, the less I think ofthem. The story of them killing animals isn't even unusual. According toPETA's own filings, in 2004 PETA killed 86.3 percent of theanimals entrusted to its care -- a number that's rising, not falling.Meanwhile, the SPCA in PETA's home town (Norfolk, Va.) was able to findloving homes for 73 percent of the animals put in its care. A shortage offunds? Nope: last year PETA took in $29 million in tax-exempt donations.It simply has other priorities for the funds, like funding terrorism(yes, really). But don't take my word for it: I got my figures fromhttp://www.PETAkillsAnimals.com-- and they have copies of PETA's state and federal filings to back itup. The bottom line: if you donate money to PETA because you think theycare for and about animals, you need to think some more. PETA literallyyells and screams about how others "kill animals" but this is howthey operate? Pathetic.

And you know what I wonder? PETA's official count of animalsthey kill is 86.3 percent. But if they're going around picking upanimals, killing them while they drive around and not even giving them achance to be adopted, and then destroying the evidence by dumpingthe bodies in the trash, are those deaths being reported? Myguess: no. While 86.3 percent is awful, the actual number is probablymuch, much higher. How dare they lecture anyoneabout the "ethical" treatment of animals!

(This is True is a weekly column featuringweird-but-true newsstories from around the world, and has been published since 1994. Clickthe link for info about free subscriptions.)



Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

7.18.2005

I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up!

I've fallen into that most dreaded of blogging trap: no real posts, just endless quizzes! So here are three more I took: insights into my personality that no one has ever seen before . . . :-)


Your Blogging Type is Pensive and Philosophical
You blog like no one else is reading . . . You tend to use your blog to explore ideas - often in long winded prose. Easy going and flexible, you tend to befriend other bloggers easily. But if they disagree with once too much, you'll pull them from your blogroll!



You are nurturing, kind, and lucky. Like mother nature, you want to help everyone. You are good at keeping secrets and tend to be secretive.A seeker of harmony, you are a natural peacemaker. You are good natured and people enjoy your company. You put people at ease and make them feel at home with you.


You Are 31 Years Old
31
Under 12: You are a kid at heart. You still have an optimistic life view - and you look at the world with awe.13-19: You are a teenager at heart. You question authority and are still trying to find your place in this world.20-29: You are a twentysomething at heart. You feel excited about what's to come... love, work, and new experiences.30-39: You are a thirtysomething at heart. You've had a taste of success and true love, but you want more!40+: You are a mature adult. You've been through most of the ups and downs of life already. Now you get to sit back and relax.

Blessings & Peace,Hugo

7.10.2005

I'm also A Book Snob :-)

HASH(0x8ee1944)
You speak eloquently and have seemingly read every
book ever published. You are a fountain of
endless (sometimes useless) knowledge, and
never fail to impress at a party.
What people love: You can answer almost any
question people ask, and have thus been
nicknamed Jeeves.
What people hate: You constantly correct their
grammar and insult their paperbacks.

What Kind of Elitist Are You?
brought to you byQuizilla

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

How Much Am I Worth?

I am worth $2,093,178 on HumanForSale.com

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

7.07.2005

Books

KC tagged me with this, so here we go!

1. How many books have I owned?
Way too many . . . i quickly counted the books in our library (our spare bedroom!) and in other places around the house, and we've got around 400 books. However, that doesn't count the many, many books we bought/acquired then either sold or gave away. We've probably gotten rid of another 200 books or so.

2. What was the last book you bought?
Hmmm . . . last book I acquired (free sample sent to me) was The New Catholic Answer Bible (about 2 weeks ago). The last book I actually paid money for was a collection of C.S. Lewis' Narnia books (for my wife, as a b-day gift).

3. What was the last book you read?
Last book I finished reading (just yesterday - I actually read it in less than two days cuz it's light reading) was lost boy lost girl (a horror/mystery type book). I'm still currently reading 8 Weeks to Optimum Health by Dr. Andrew Weil, The Jesus I Never Knew by Philip Yancey, The Birth of Christianity by Dominic Crossan, Inner Christianity by Richard Smoley, Christ In A Post-Christian World by Pamela Young, and The Sacred Way by Tony Jones.

4. What are FIVE books that have meant a lot to you.
Hmmm . . . that's a really hard question . . . so let's see . . . I'm gonna cheat and put a few more than five (and I'll limit myself - I could keep adding to this list!) :-)
A) The Bible: I started reading it my sophomore year in High School and read through most of it before I graduated High School. I actually started on one of those small, red Gideon Bible New Testaments, then moved on to a full NAB Bible. Haven't looked back since :-)
B) Care of the Soul / The Soul's Religion by Thomas Moore: I really like his approach to soul/spirit, and his alchemical approach of not trying to "fix" all of life's problems and bad moods
C) One River, Many Wells by Matthew Fox: see my comment below (D); I like this book because it ties in strands from disparate religions and tries to show the interconnectedness of faith where some strive to see only differences
D) Hyperspace by Michio Kaku: My introduction to the wonderful world of cosmology and theoretical physics - I devoured the book and then went out and bought more on the topic
E) The World's Religions by Houston Smith: I've loved world religions since I started my own spiritual path my sophomore year in HS, and Smith's treatment of them - very respectful, very loving, putting each religion's best foot forward - only deepened my love for them.
F) Catholicism by Richard McBrien: My first college religion textbook - I loved the way McBrien made everything fit together, the way he gave historical as well as theological reasons for the hows and whys of Catholicism - it helped shaped my own historical approach to my faith
G) By Way of the Heart by Wilkie Au: Another college textbook, this one on holistic spirituality - I still find myself using stories and examples from that text in my own teaching today
H) The Introvert Advantage by Marti Olsen Laney: On the Myers-Briggs/Kiersey-Bates temperament sorters I usually come out slightly introverted - I really liked this book because it helped me get a handle on my own introversion as well as the flaming introversion of my wife - highly recommended reading for anyone!

5. Tag five people who haven't played yet
Ummm . . . I don't stray too far into the blogosphere - I think the people I might tag have already been tagged - if not, I'll tag later! :-)

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

7.05.2005

What D&D Character Are You?

So unless you play/have played the role playing game Dungeons and Dragons this won't make any sense :-)

I took two quizzes here: http://www.angelfire.com/dragon/terragf/

This is what I came up with:

I'm a human true neutral Sorcerer
My stats are:
S 8
D 11
C 8
I 15
W 13
C 12

Human was a no brainer, wizard was a very close second to sorcerer (and considering my stats that's what I should go for!), and Neutral Good was a very close second (by only 2 points!) to True neutral. Enjoy! :-)

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo

American Gods

I finished reading a book last week called American Gods by Neil Gaiman [I may have misspelled his last name and I'm too lazy to look it up :-)]. The premise of the book is that when every immigrant came over to America they brought their own faith - their own gods - with them. These gods (aspects of the god that was worshipped in the old country) then took up habitation in this new world. As their followers dwindled, they still stuck around - they could not leave this country.

In current days they're still around, but have very little power because a new breed of gods has taken over the American conscious. The book revolves around the old gods trying to rally forces to take on the new gods that Americans worship. One of the most powerful new gods that Americans worship is Media. There's a brief interchange between Odin and Media in the book that I really liked - Odin laments that hardly anyone offers sacrifices to him anymore - hence his loss of power. Media says that people sacrifice to it all the time; when asked what they sacrifice, she quips "Time, mostly."

I thought it was an insightful commentary. Looking at how much time and money we Americans spend on entertainment (buying and watching TV, buying and going to the movies, buying and listening to music, etc.), we do seem to be worshipping media to a great extent. I've noticed it with my family . . . if nothing interrupts my 8 year old son he can happily play Gamecube and watch TV all day long. My wife can sit and read Harry Potter stories on the internet for the same amount of time, and I can read and watch movies as well. If we don't help police each other, we can literally sacrifice our while day to various forms of media.

Here's praying that we offer sacrifice where sacrifice is due, and not let any of the new gods (sports, media, the internet . . . I can't remember any of the other ones off hand) take over the rightful rule of our hearts, minds and souls.

Blessings & Peace,
Hugo